Google Scholar – an unlimited database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a good amount of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
Stacy, a tenant in the duplex owned by Martin, filed a civil lawsuit against her landlord, claiming he had not given her adequate notice before raising her rent, citing a new state regulation that demands a minimum of 90 times’ notice. Martin argues that The brand new regulation applies only to landlords of large multi-tenant properties.
The a lot of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it's made crystal clear that police is free to acquire action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities subject to regulation. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. In case the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and so they shall be assigned non-subject duties while in the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed to your disposal of the instant petition within the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner and also private respondents and will acquire care of each of the facets of the case and guarantee that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
145 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 with the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued on the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted inside of a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically cause exoneration from departmental charges based over the same factual grounds. While a writ under Article 199 is offered in specific limited situations, it can be generally not the appropriate remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full opportunity to cross-look at witnesses and present his/her defense but did not encourage the department of his/her innocence.
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the law when it is unclear the way it applies to any offered situation, often rendering judgments based over the intent of here lawmakers as well as circumstances of your case at hand. These types of decisions become a guide for upcoming similar cases.
On June sixteen, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of the boy by a guardian advertisement litem, against DCFS, the social worker, plus the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf on the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advert litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court to get a dismissal based on absolute immunity, because they were all performing in their jobs with DCFS.
500,000/- (Rupees Five hundred thousand only) Every and also the same shall be saved inside the police station to your effect that no harm shall be caused to the petitioners. 5. In view of the above mentioned, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Read more
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance of the respondents that pensionary benefits can be withheld on account in the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section 20 in the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does offer for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. These involve if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension might be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension may be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established by the government.
Problems or Errors In the event you encounter any technical problems with this website (like a undesirable link or possibly a portion of an opinion missing), please notify the eService Center.
Typically, only an appeal accepted with the court of final resort will resolve such differences and, For several reasons, this sort of appeals in many cases are not granted.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, it is also a properly-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.